 |
| Sultan of Sulu, Sultan Jamalul Kiram II (picture taken around 1936) |
ON SABAH PROPRIETARY RIGHTS (DIFFERENT FROM SOVEREIGNTY RIGHTS WHICH BELONG TO THE REPUBLIC): THE SULTANATE OF SULU HAS NINE LEGALLY RECOGNISED ROYAL HEIRS... And their intra-family bickering must not affect whatever the Republic's position on its claim to Sabah which, by law - by virtue of Republic Act 5446, is Philippine territory.
The nine royal heirs must be allowed to decide among thelselves who their sultan is... we, the non-sultanate member citizens of the Republic, must leave them alone to sort out their own family problem.
Government must therefore abstain from putting more fat in the already confusing problem by remarking "We don't even know who the legitimate sultan is!" Government must step back and avoid such confusing remarks because the principle of Government support for their struggle must be for the Sultanate of Sulu as a body.
Unless government and the public come to terms with the principle that there are nine legal heirs representing the Sultanate of Sulu, Government itself will be defeating the Republic's own legal cause. Government must not cofuse the people of this country and instead must use the Philippine law to Government's advantage in trying to resolve the Sabah crisis which has now claimed several dozens dead in the hands of a foreign government's maniacal troops.
~~ Admins, Philippine Sabah Claim Forum
08 March 2013
The nine royal heirs must be allowed to decide among thelselves who their sultan is... we, the non-sultanate member citizens of the Republic, must leave them alone to sort out their own family problem.
Government must therefore abstain from putting more fat in the already confusing problem by remarking "We don't even know who the legitimate sultan is!" Government must step back and avoid such confusing remarks because the principle of Government support for their struggle must be for the Sultanate of Sulu as a body.
Unless government and the public come to terms with the principle that there are nine legal heirs representing the Sultanate of Sulu, Government itself will be defeating the Republic's own legal cause. Government must not cofuse the people of this country and instead must use the Philippine law to Government's advantage in trying to resolve the Sabah crisis which has now claimed several dozens dead in the hands of a foreign government's maniacal troops.
~~ Admins, Philippine Sabah Claim Forum
08 March 2013
IN PICTURE: Sultan of Sulu, Sultan Jamalul Kiram II (picture taken around 1936).
Technically wala naman talagang alam ang nasa gobyerno kaya nga sila clueless hehehe.Nothing in their nutshell.
ReplyDeleteTHE BROKEN LINEAGE BY USURPERS:
ReplyDeleteWhen Sultan Pulalun (son of Sultan Jamalul Kiram-I of Muwalil Wasit) signed the presented Spanish protocol Treaty in allowing the Spanish to lived in the Sulus then transferred his seat to the hinterlands; two British Subjects, Baron Von de Overbeck and Alfred Dent came to the Sulus to ask to Lease North North Borneo from the Sulu Sultan,wherein Jamalul Agdam presented himself as Sulu Sultan Jamalul Alam (naming himself after Brunei Sultan Jamalul Alam-II). Convinced, the two British Subjects proceeded to have Jamalul Alam signed the Lease Treaty that late afternoon of around 6pm, and left at mid-night without heeding to their verbal agreement of off-loading the Arms and munitions in the morning of the next day.
Sultan Pulalun did in-fact wrote a letter of revocation to the the said Leased. However, the British North Borneo Company of the two British Subjects moreover did not heed to the said revocation. Considering the times and the weak empowerment to state sovereignty prior to the establishment of the United Nations Organization, Sultan Pulalun could not do anything. Sultan Pulalun's Prince, Maharaja Adinda (Prince Heir apparent)Taup undermined when Jamalul Alam was succeeded by Badar'uddin-II, the aupposed son of Alam, as Sultan of Sulu.
Moreover, Alimu'ddin, Harun Ar-Rashid and Amirul Kiram Awal-II were contesting each other that each is the true succeessor to the Throne,the Spanish government in Manila instead proclaimed Harun Ar-Rashid was the Sultan of Sulu, wherein Alimu'ddin was forced to have retired in Tawi-Tawi and was referred to tauntingly by the Spanish as "El Viejo de Tawi-Tawi" Meaning the Old Man of Tawi-Tawi. However, with the fiercesome Amirul Kiram Awal-II, the latter with his followers forced Harun Ar-Rashid to have left and went to South Palawan where he died.
Amirul Kiram Awal-III was then proclaimed by his direct followers,as Sultan of Sulu in the reigning name as Sultan Jamalul Kiram-II presented as the son of Sultan Jamalul Kiram-I (Muwalil Wasit). So, why did Sultan Pulalun proclaimed his Prince Maharaja Adinda taup in 1859 before even the 1861 Jamalul Alam (Agdam)? and why can not the present kirams claim Sultan Pulalun as a Kiram? wherein claiming Sultan Jamalul Alam-Kiram, Sultan Badar'uddin-Kiram.
Amirul Kiram Awal-II of Sultan Jamalul Kiram-II had no Adinda or Prince and was childless, and when He died on June 7, 1936, there was a controversy of who would be recieving the Lease treaty payments of North Borneo. The British High Court at Jesselton(Kota Kanibalu)North borneo-Sabah wherein Chief Justice Macaskie ruled in 1939 favored, if any, Kiram heir. It took 21 years later in 1957 when uncannily a claimant-Ismael kiram went to claim the lease payments. Ismael Kiram and five other relatives were awarded the lease payments as "Private Heirs" to their supposed predecessor, the 1884-1915 Sultan Jamalul kiram-II who died in 1936, and Sovereignty as "Sultan" was not in issue. However, the present Kirams claims to be Sultans, all of its family heirs. When in-fact its successions should have been from Sultan Pulalun, his highness' Maharaja Adinda.
www.royalsultanate.weebly.com , see resolution.