Pages

Friday 1 March 2013

Philippine claim to Sabah and Philippine law

Old Sultanate of Sulu flag
There is still a very poor understanding of what the Philippine Sabah claim is all about, it seems, even in the so-called educated class. I've just read comments in a thread somewhere spewed by someone who can recite some Wiki entry but still misses the point.

For instance, a well-known columnist for a Philippine broadsheet commented in a post by another columnist for another Philippine broadsheet the following:

(I will not name the said columnist to avoid embarassing him) "Sultanate might own it but that doesn't make it Philippine territory. No different from land owned by a Filipino family in Long Island - that's not Philippine territory. Do we send our troops to die for that?"

The comment of this columnist showed his total ignorance of where the Philippines is at in terms of the nation's Sabah claim. I was forced to butt in the conversation and told him about the law -- he did not comment any further because he was wrong: Sabah is, by Philippine law, a Philippine territory.

You see, Republic Acts 5522 and 5446 signed and passed in 1968 specify, stipulate that PH has acquired title and dominion over Sabah, hence, by law, it is PH territory albeit disputed and under de facto control of Malaysia. The law has not been abrogated, i.e., the RAs have not been repealed. So, even from a purely Philippine legal standpoint, Ph has the right to prosecute the claim. Sultanate or not, PH has contractual obligations to do it on behalf of the Republic. PH obligations were contracted based on the transfer of full sovereignty rights over Sabah by then Sultan Esmail Kiram 1 on 12 Sept 1962 which the Republic accepted through the government of President Diosdado Macapagal.

Now, in my view, the Republic is duty bound to raise the claim and to help in the recognition of the Sultanate of Sulu royal heirs (sultanate of Sulu contrary to some claim is not extinct) as proprietary right holders. It is actually as simple as that. Also, it is my conviction that the Philippine government cannot simply drop or relinquish the claim without violating the law that is if the law has not been repealed, which I am sure has not [been repealed]. It is as simple as that, sultanate or no sultanate.

~~ Admin AdB
for the Defenders of the Philippine Sabah and Spratly Claims
02 March 2013 or the 2nd Day of Infamy for the Republic's betrayal of the Suluks in Sabah

1 comment:

  1. I HOPE THAT YOUR MIND WILL LEARNED SOMETHING THAT YOU HAVEN'T LEARNED BEFORE..
    OWNING SABAH AND CLAIMING BY THOSE ILLEGITIMATE HEIRS THE KIRAM FAMILY....
    DID YOU LOST YOUR MIND OR JUST YOU ARE PRETENDING THAT YOU LOST SOME KNOTS...
    YOU SHOULD BE CAREFUL ON DOINGS SUCH THINGS .. (HMMMPPPP) ALLAH AND NABI MUHAMMAD (S.A.W.) WILL NEVER REGRET THIS.

    SHARIF IS A DESCENDANT WHICH CAME FROM PROPHET MUHAMMAD, WITH RESPECT, ROYALTIES AND HONORS. THE SHARIF PULALON/PULALUN FAMILIES IS ON PREPARED FOR CLAIMING WHAT LOST HAS LOST.

    HRH SULTAN MUHAMMAD PULALON/PULALUN
    _____ THE REAL SULTAN OF SULU AND NORTH BORNEO _____
    THE SULTAN THAT CAME FROM PROPHET MUHAMMAD LINEAGE AND LEGITIMATE SULTAN OF THE SULU KINGDOM...

    YOU KIRAM FAMILY SHOULD BE PUNISHED AND BURNED YOUR SOUL IN NARKA JAHANNAM

    MANGAYO NGAYO KAMI MGA KASALIPAN SIN BUSUNGUN KAMU!!!!!

    HINDA INNEH YADTO WAY NA HIBUK NAWAPAT NA SAH.. TAGARI NIYO IN DUMATUNG KASUSAHAN... KANIYO...

    LYUMU NYO NA IN HULA SUG YAN... LYUMIAN NYO IN NGAN TAUSUG... PAPATAYUN IN ADDAT BYAHAN... TAGARI NYO ...

    ReplyDelete